A project of the European University 'Viadrina', Frankfurt, Germany (Study and Research Centre on Media Law, Law Faculty)
Media Section

Format: HTML Text

Seeking help?

How can one react against wrongful Wikipedia articles?

Are you annoyed by an article about yourself or an institution or organisation which you are responsible for? PR strategists, cyber-warriors and lobbyists have long since discovered Wikipedia. Spreading positive PR is the one side. But even worse is running smear campaigns against competitors and opponents on Wikipedia. Often people concerned are not aware of this - or react too late. How can one respond if a Wikipedia Article is obviously intended to discredit an person, institution or organisation and damage their reputation? Wiki-Watch provides information for those affected, which you will find in our FAQ section. << Request general Wiki-Watch help here >>

What you definitively should not do:

Don't edit an article concerning yourself - this violates the Wikipedia rules in most cases.

What you might do:

  1. Use the discussion page of the article to indicate factual mistakes, missing sources, bias or violations of the rules on biographies of living persons. Post factual content and links to reputable, informative other pages.
  2. Always prove your point of view by refering to relevant sources.
  3. Inform an administrator about the main author and the deficiency.
  4. Brief Wiki-Watch about serious misinformation and violations of the Wikipedia neutrality principle(1). Transparency may help. << Brief Wiki-Watch here >>
  5. In case of sensitive issues that obviously allow you to propose their deletion, contact Wikipedia Oversight.
  6. In case of serious infringements of your personality rights consider legal measures against the operator of Wikipedia, the Wikimedia Foundation based and with place of jurisdiction in San Francisco, USA. This requires specialised legal advice. The success of the proceedings is uncertain.(2)

Less promising...

is taking legal measures against national Non-Profit-Organisations promoting Wikipedia in certain countries without being the responsible operator of the platform.

Legal advice on Wikipedia

  1. List of policies and guidelines
  2. Wikipedia copyright policy (primarily important for pictures)


  1. "Neutral Point of View" principle of Wikipedia
  2. Seigenthaler incident
Wikipedia vs. fake news - a fair fight? (12.09.2017)
Is Wikipedia a tool for the common internet user to spot fake news when they stumble upon them? What is fake news? Fake news are false reports...
Wikipedians on Egyptian protests: Time to call it a revolution? (01.02.2011)
While thousands rally in Egyptian cities today to raise their voices to force President Mubarak from power, the people's massive protests are...
Wiki-Watch.org: a new tool to evaluate the quality of Wikipedia’s articles (13.01.2011)
Online service checking both the reliability of any article – and of any word within A new tool to evaluate the quality of Wikipedia articles...
Ten Simple Rules for Editing Wikipedia (12.01.2011)
Article by Darren W. Logan, Massimo Sandal, Paul P. Gardner, Magnus Manske, Alex Bateman Wikipedia is the world's most successful online...
„5 Stars at Wiki-Watch“ – How does our formal rating work? (12.01.2011)
The quantity of sources and authors of an article are our primary criteria Preliminary remarks The allocation of the stars and the...

SY 0